BY HARUN YAHYA
The
theory of evolution claims that a particular species transforms into a
brand-new species with very small changes. However, to prove such a
claim it is necessary to find proof of these transitional species with
the aforementioned changes and to present them as scientific evidence.
The alleged transitional species must originate from an imaginary
ancestor species and possess new developing organs, systems or limbs.
However, such imaginary transformations, which involve trial and error
and are claimed to have lasted for millions of years, will result in an
unsuccessful transitional species with half-limbs or missing organs. It
is interesting that THERE IS NOT EVEN A SINGLE TRANSITIONAL FORM in the
fossil record that would bear witness to such changes. Contrary to the
expectations of evolutionists, the fossil record is instead full of
species with intact and complete organs and systems. This shows us that
the millions of species we have witnessed so far all had the same
characteristics 100 million years ago.
There is NO CHAOS in the fossil records
It
can be expected that a world governed by coincidences would bring along
chaos as well. In such an imaginary system, it is impossible for
species to have symmetry or aesthetics. Even the existence of life
itself would be impossible in a world prevailed by coincidences.
Mutations, claimed to be the so-called mechanism of evolution, lead to
distortions and deficiencies in DNA, and as a result, distorted and
irregular structures, defects in organs and systems occur. According to
the claim of evolution, we should frequently encounter fossil samples of
different species that have undergone mutation, and therefore have not
survived and went extinct. However, there is not even a single sample of
it.
This fact, posing a problem for the evolutionists, was first admitted by Charles Darwin:
“Why
if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine
gradations, do we not everywhere see INNUMERABLE transitional forms? Why
is not all nature in CONFUSION instead of the species being, as we see
them, WELL DEFINED?” (Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species, p.108)
Despite
being the founder of the theory, Darwin admitted that the fossils,
witnessing the history of life, were not confusing and that the fossils
were perfectly in order. Strange- looking transitional species have
never existed throughout history. The very moment a species appeared in
the fossil record, they had intact organs and symmetrical limbs.
There is no such thing as “Innumerable Transitional Species”
We
always find fossil samples of complete and intact species in the fossil
record. Some of them belong to species that emerged with perfect limbs
and organs, and then went extinct, and some belong to existent species
that emerged millions of years ago with their perfect and present
appearance. As claimed by evolutionists, the intermediate forms, which
developed intermediate features that proved to be disadvantageous and
caused the extinction of that species, certainly do not exist. The
fossil record offers NOT A SINGLE FOSSIL OF AN INTERMEDIATE FORM.
According
to the claim of evolution, the number of imaginary transitional species
is supposed to be geometric multiples of the number of species known
today. The so-called evolutionary tree must be full of unsuccessful
species and must have innumerable subsections that have ceased to exist.
This number could have been expressed in the trillions. Charles Darwin
always emphasized that the amount of transitional species, which he
hoped for but never found its existence, is INNUMERABLE:
INNUMERABLE transitional forms must have existed, why we not find them embedded in COUNTLESS NUMBERS IN THE CRUST OF THE EARTH?.. Why then is not EVERY GEOLOGICAL FORMATION AND EVERY STRATUM full of such intermediate links?" (Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species, p.172-280)
As
Darwin pointed out, if the claim of evolution were true, almost every
geological stratum would be full of such unsuccessful attempts, namely
strange-looking transitional forms. These imaginary transitional life
forms, trillions of which should be found in every fossil layer thus far
excavated, should have been encountered by now; however, the situation
is exactly the opposite. Fossils refute evolution by not showing a
single transitional form.
The fact that species have remained unchanged
Paleontology,
the study of fossils, reveals that species have not changed and have
always remained stable throughout the time they remained on earth. The
famous evolutionist paleontologist Niles Eldredge also stated that this
is an undeniable fact:
Stasis is now abundantly well documented as the preeminent paleontological pattern in the evolutionary history of species. (Niles Eldredge, Reinventing Darwin, 1995, p. 77 - http://bevets.com/equotese.htm)
It
is an obvious fact that species emerged on the earth fully developed
and have remained unchanged throughout their existence. This is a
situation that can never be contradicted by any paleontologist and is
always confessed. One of the leading evolutionists, American
paleontologist and science historian Stephen Jay Gould, wrote the
following about these two most prominent features of the fossil record:
The history of most fossil species includes two features particularly inconsistent with gradualism:
(1) Stasis. Most
species exhibit no directional change during their tenure on earth.
They appear in the fossil record looking much the same as when they
disappear; morphological change is usually limited and directionless.
(2) Sudden
appearance. In any local area, a species does not arise gradually by
the steady transformation of its ancestors; it appears all at once and
'fully formed.' (S. J. Gould, “Evolution’s Erratic Pace", Natural History, vol. 86, May 1977)
Gould again continues his confessions in an article in the Natural History magazine as follows:
Statis,
or non-change of most fossil species during their lengthy geological
lifespans, was tacitly acknowledged by all paleontologists, but almost
never studied explicitly... The overwhelming prevalence of stasis became
an embarrassing feature of the fossil record, but left as a
manifestation of nothing (that is, non-evolution). (S.J. Gould, "Cordelia's Dilemma," Natural History, 1993, p. 15)
Atlas of Creation and Fossils Say 'We Have Not Changed'
As
is seen, comparing fossils with their living counterparts and showing
that they have not undergone any change is nothing but disclosing a well-known fact
to the public. This fact, which has always been withheld from the
public, reached and was spread to the public at large through the Atlas of Creation,
the magnum opus of the author Adnan Oktar, writing under the pen name
Harun Yahya. Paleontology has shown that species do not emerge slowly in
millions of years as claimed, but that they emerge miraculously, in
their perfect forms. With the work of Mr. Adnan Oktar, the findings and
fossils that have been hidden from the public for so many years have
been revealed at last and the secrets of the evolutionists have been
shown for all the world to see.
Although
this extraordinary piece of work exhibits only about 2,000 fossils in
detailed photographs, the number of classified fossils that are stored
in repositories in universities or in museums with date tags, is about
700 million. The fact that some evolutionists, who feel upset about
these facts write stories about merely three or four fossils out of the
thousands mentioned in the Atlas and try to make unfair
criticisms shows just how desperate they actually are. These criticisms
are far from being scientific and typically do not go beyond ill-advised
sarcasm as obviously, in the scientific literature, there are thousands
of other examples of the fossils in question.
Seeking Imaginary Ancestors through Mathematics
Evolutionists
claim that humans share a common ancestor with chimpanzees.
Speculations go on and on, one day claiming that chimpanzees are closer
to humans, and the next the bonobos. While there is no evidence of any
transformation, according to what exactly can Darwinists establish a
relationship between those two? At this point, evolutionists produce
statistical formula that they invented from scratch and which have no
scientific validity.
The
deception here is based on the comparison of some selected base-pairs
of specific genes of the two species. Here it should not be assumed that
all the codes of the two species' genomes have been compared one by
one. This fact is better understood when we examine this trick used to
create the imaginary family tree:
When
studies of genetic similarity between man and apes are conducted, only
certain genes are compared. For example, while drawing the family tree
of living primates, 34,927 base pairs of 54 genes were considered. There
are about 25,000 genes in the human body and not all of them are
compared here.
Evolutionists
initially claimed that there is a 1% difference between the chimpanzee
and the human genome, but later this difference was generally accepted
as 4%; this rate corresponds to about 35 million nucleotides.
Evolutionists are in search of an imaginary mechanism in which this
difference is made up. Therefore, they suggest mutations that altered
the DNA, added or subtracted codes, all of which would completely harm
the organism. They claim that history worked backwards like this and
that mutations worked regularly, and had only beneficial effects all the
time- which in fact is impossible - and thus they make fake
calculations about the dates when the two species may have split.
There is no fossil of the imaginary common ancestor, and there are no
intermediate species either; nevertheless, evolutionists present
calculations, which do not have scientific validity, as if they are true
under the rubric of "prediction" to the public. The imaginary data,
entered into a computer on the basis of this claim, is executed under
the name of the Bayes formula and the lie that they
can reach out to their imaginary common ancestor that existed some five
to seven million years ago as a result of the calculations made through
this imaginary data, is put forth.
The Bayesian Approach in Statistics and Scientific Errors Arisen from Presupposition
The
Bayesian formula used in some statistical calculations enables a
retrospective analysis of a particular claim. The Bayesian formula is
used to calculate conditional probabilities. So if a person claims that
'two species were derived from a common ancestor', the formula works to
verify this fake hypothesis and calculates how many millions of years
must elapse to make up the 35 million nucleotide difference. In reality,
however, the 35 million nucleotide difference has never been made up,
but the formula provides a result because the claim is entered in this
way. Therefore, the Bayesian approach is regarded as a scale of a person’s belief for any fact rather than physical evidence.
As
we can see, the gaps in the genes are closed in the minds through
computer formulas, and the history of life is arbitrarily written. It is
evident that such studies, carried out through the postulate of
'evolution exists', have no scientific aspect and completely serve
ideological purposes. This mentality, which is far from being able to
explain how even a single gene, encoded with information, emerged by
itself, uses genetics as a cover.
Paleontology,
histology, biochemistry and all other branches of science reveal that
life is so complex that it is not possible for it to have come about by
pure chance. All species, a single cell - and even a single protein
belonging to these species - constitute indisputable proof for the
infinite knowledge and power of God.
Comments
Post a Comment